A Monumental Concession To Islam

The following are excerpts from an article entitled: Jihad Against Free Speech.

In 2005, the OIC (Organization of Islamic Conference) urged the United Nations Commission on Human Rights to pass a resolution called “combating defamation of religions.” Although the title of the resolution referred to religions generally, the text cited concerns only Islam specifically. Not surprisingly, the countries that voted in favor of the resolution included many Muslim countries such as Saudi Arabia, Malaysia, Qatar, Kuwait, and Sudan, among others. Freer nations such as the United States, Australia, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy, Ireland, and Japan, all voted in opposition to the resolution.

At the OIC’s 2006 summit in Mecca, it adopted a zero tolerance policy regarding insults to Islam, going so far as to include “hostile glances” in its definition of Islamophic behavior. The immediate goal of the summit was to obtain “protection” for Islam in European parliaments and the UN including the Human Rights Council (which replaced the Human Rights Commission). It also proposed the creation of an “Islamic Council of Human Rights” and a “Charter of Human Rights in Islam.” Both would be based on Sharia law and run contrary to the UN’s Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
You might be asking yourself, "Who cares what they want?" This might give you an idea of just how dangerous conceding to the OIC really is:
The Organization of Islamic Conference (OIC) is an Islamist supremacist organization. Composed of 57 member states with Muslim majority populations, the OIC is the largest Islamic body in the world. It is also the largest international organization of any kind, second only to the United Nations. It represents an estimated 1.5 billion Muslims across the Middle East, Asia and Africa.
And to further demonstrate the power of the OIC, what happened this year will set your teeth on edge:
In March 2008, the OIC held a two-day summit in Senegal, where it produced a battle plan to combat Islamophobia. It would defend itself against all forms of free expression that could be interpreted as criticism of Islam, including that of cartoonists, film producers, reporters, politicians or governments.

Countries that already regularly deny religious freedom and freedom of speech to their own citizens, demanded legal measures to have their oppressive rules imposed internationally. “I don’t think freedom of expression should mean freedom from blasphemy” explained Abdoulaye Wade, Chairman of the OIC. “There can be no freedom without limits.”

As a result of this summit, the United Nations Human Rights Council passed the resolution!

It’s ironic that countries which follow an interpretation of Islam that disallows religious freedom or freedom of speech at home, are utilizing these very freedoms abroad to achieve their Islamist goals. By turning the definition of freedom on its head, free speech and religious freedom for non-Muslims can now be condemned as anti-Islamic.
Islam has gained a major concession. This is an important first step in the ultimate political goal of worldwide Shari'a law. The attainment of this political goal is a religious duty for all Muslims. One way to wage jihad is with violence. Another way is to wage jihad by gaining concessions, and the first, most important concession to gain is silencing criticism of Islam itself. The passing of the United Nations Human Rights Council's resolution was a step in that direction.

Read the whole article here: Jihad Against Free Speech.


Anonymous November 10, 2008 at 8:39 AM  

If islam is so supreme; where are the strong in faith that can take any attack, even verbal against their faith? It's like a bunch of spoiled little children who have a fit everytime they don't get thier way, only when they have a fit, they destroy, maim and murder with absolutely no remorse if they harm the not guilty or innocent. No backbone murdering cowards, never attack the army of thier enemies directly, always the same with those that fear the truth will get out about who and what they are.

Citizen Warrior November 10, 2008 at 1:18 PM  

WileySnakeSkins, the reason they do not tolerate verbal attacks on Islam is that the Islamic ideology tells them they must defend Islam. Their leader and Prophet had people assassinated who criticized Islam, and it says over seventy times in the Koran that a Muslim should follow the example of Mohammad.

Their reaction is simply part of the overarching goal of Islam: To make the whole world an Islamic state.

They have, indeed, attacked the army of their enemies directly many times in their history. But what they're doing now is a much larger and more complete jihad, very well organized and with a long-term plan. Please read Robert Spencer's new book "Stealth Jihad" to learn more about it.

Anonymous November 29, 2010 at 12:07 PM  

Well I will say this...Ignorance is NO Excuse.

I for one live my life as a Muslim, American and African American to top it off !!!I guess that gives me three strikes. I see so many comments that it is sometimes easier to NOT respond. But this one.......ummm yeah.

And as unfortunate as it is.....Ummmmm yeah and you will continually be attacked as long as you are in their lands..do you think for 1 minute you will allow some outsiders to come to your home and tell you what to do.....

America is a BULLY....what ever WE as a nation touches we destroy!!! It goes back hundreds of years.

DO you seriously think that I as a Muslim American will try to implement Shariah Law??? Seriously though...a lot of Muslims do not like Shariah...however it comes with the religion of Islam.

As for Jihad...look up the linguistic meaning of that word..it means "self-struggle" ..like someone who struggles against themselves in right and wrong pertaining to their own soul.....

As for the " Follow the Prophet" ...we do in matters concerning the Deen. Other then that NOOOOOOO. Just like Christians do...yes and any other religion......there are some who do whatever they want to in the name of the religion.

We as Muslims fear Allah as He should be feared. Not men and boys.

You can continue to call us murders, and anything else...what do you think the Spanish Inquisition was...or the Crusades for that matter.

If you can not or do not like what is going on overseas...bring your asses home!!! Mind your business...and anyway President Bush is the one that lied.....You all fell for it. Now look you want to pack up your toys and come home to mommy !!! ROTFLMAO !!!

Anonymous November 29, 2010 at 12:08 PM  


Citizen Warrior November 29, 2010 at 12:55 PM  

"The Hadith of Bukhari gives all of the tactical details of jihad. A simple counting method shows that 3% of the hadiths are about the inner struggle, whereas, 97% of the hadiths are about jihad as war. So is jihad the inner struggle? Yes, 3%. Is jihad the war against kafirs? Yes, 97%."

- Bill Warner

wheatington July 10, 2011 at 5:33 AM  

Crusades are not part of Christian doctrine. The hadiths, however, show Muslims how Mohamed acted. Why is this important? Because Allah said Mohamed was the perfect model of a Muslim and was to be emulated in all things.

The lessons of the hadiths are for all Muslims for all times!

Muslims know this. Those who say the hadiths are mere history are liars.

Anonymous November 12, 2011 at 5:45 AM  

The crusades were sent by the pope who after seeing the bloody invasion of muslims murdering christians sent the crusades to stop them. The crusades were self defence!

Anonymous March 30, 2013 at 10:11 AM  

"Muslims know this. Those who say the hadiths are mere history are liars"...and we ALL know how much muslims tell lies!! Its called "Taqiyya"

Get New Posts Via Email

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

You Can Help Us Here

When you come across stories about concessions to Islam, please send them to:

I urge all of us to use this link whenever we mention concessions to Islam: http://concess.blogspot.com

Setting Precedents

As Robert Spencer put it: "...it's a small accommodation in itself, but it reinforces the precedent that American practices must give way to Muslim ones whenever they clash. Once that precedent is set, it does indeed lead to the Islamization of American society, unless at a certain point non-Muslims are willing to draw the line and say 'Thus far, but no farther. No more accommodation of Muslim demands.' That line will never be drawn, however, as long as Americans continue to fail to see the larger implications and inevitable outcome of these individual incidents."

  © Blogger template Ramadhan Al-Mubarak by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP