Sharia in America

THE FOLLOWING is an excerpt from an email by Guy Rogers, the executive director of Act! for America:

In a September 21st column, Washington Post columnist Eugene Robinson belittled Newt Gingrich for painting “Islam as the new Red Menace.” He dismissed any concern about a “stealthy insinuation of sharia into America’s legal system because no such thing is happening.”

And the kicker: “The ‘stealth jihadis,’ I suppose, must be like the ‘known communists’ on the list in Sen. Joseph McCarthy's hand.”

Robinson claims there is only one example of sharia here in America, the case of the New Jersey judge who ruled that a Muslim man committed no crime while beating and raping his wife, because he was acting consistent with his Islamic “practices.”

Robinson’s arrogance is exceeded only by his ignorance.

* Sharia has penetrated our financial system, in the form of sharia-compliant financial instruments offered by the likes of Citi Group and AIG. In an example of government accommodating sharia, Minnesota offers sharia-compliant mortgages for Muslims.

* Muslim prison employees, law enforcement officials, and even a Disneyland employee, have sued for the right to wear the hijab as part of their uniforms.

* Muslim parents in New Jersey are demanding private prayer rooms for their children in the PUBLIC elementary schools.

* According to a National Public Radio report in 2007, as many as 100,000 Muslims are living in polygamous marriages here in America.

* Harvard provided women-only gym hours to accommodate the demands of Muslims.

Of course, I could go on and on.

The Ground Zero Mosque imam was touted by politically correct elites as a paragon of interfaith tolerance. Now America knows Imam Rauf believes any government that does not practice sharia law is “unjust.”

Twenty years ago, those in the UK who spoke out against the coming of sharia were also ridiculed. Today there are some 85 sharia courts in the UK.

The playground antics of enablers like Robinson, who insist on calling names, conjuring up the demon of McCarthyism, and engaging in a foolish “see no sharia, hear no sharia, speak no sharia” will not change these facts nor diminish the threat.

But every time they launch into their sanctimonious condemnations of anyone who dares to expose the threat of stealth jihad, Islamists laugh at them behind their backs for being such dupes.

5 comments:

Michael Merry September 24, 2010 at 5:56 AM  

I agree with this opinion - 100%.
Islam is more a totalitarian ideology than a religion; and there must be no concessions, whatsoever, to this primitive creed in the U.S.
Those that have been granted must be reversed.
One needs only to look at Europe to see what happens when muslims get their way, incrementally ...ever so gradually

SOUND GENERAL QUARTERS

Freedom Of Speech essay Help December 1, 2010 at 8:10 AM  

I liked this post very much as it has helped me a lot in my research and is quite interesting as well. Thank you for sharing this information with us.

Freedom Of Speech essay Help

Anonymous April 21, 2011 at 9:33 PM  

Islam has been doing this for 1400 years. The Caliphate/Ottoman Empire ended in 1924. Hitler wrote Mein Kampf...best seller in Muz countries right now. The Grand Mufti of Jerusalem helped Hitler kill Jews. In 1928 Muslim Brotherhood was created to RE-create the caliphate.

Spain conquered by Moors.
Vienna
Constantinople
Poland was country who got rid of Islam in Europe in 1600's.
Islam is Nazism on acid.
Michael Merry: You are correct. Europe, especially Sweden, Norway and England are in big trouble.

The only way to fight Islam is to fight harder than they do with bigger weapons. That's the only way. That's how it's been done all through 1400 years.

We can thank our stupid government for bringing them in by the boatloads....NO SHARIA.NO ISLAM.

By the way, Thomas Jefferson created Navy to obliterate Somali pirates. He knew what Islam was.

Anonymous April 24, 2011 at 10:30 AM  

great blog - here's my 2 cents :)

islam is a horrible ideology for human rights

5 key things about islam

1. mythical beliefs - all religions have these (faith) because its part of being a religion: having beliefs without proof until after the believer dies. the problem is people will believe almost anything.

2. totalitarianism - islam has no seperation of church and state: sharia law governs all. there is no free will in islam: only submission to the will of allah as conveniently determined by the imams who spew vapors to feather their own nests. there are no moderate muslims: they all support sharia law.

3. violence - islam leads the pack of all religions in violent tenets for their ideology & history: having eternal canonical imperatives for supremacy at all costs and calling for violence & intimidation as basic tools to achieve these goals.

4. dishonesty - only islam has dishonesty as a fundamental tenet: this stems from allah speaking to mohamhead & abrogation in the koran which is used to explain how mo's peaceful early life was superseded by his warlord role later.

5. misogyny - present day islam is still rooted in 8th century social ethics: treating females as property of men good only for children, severely limiting their activities, dressing them in shower curtains and worse.

conclusions ??

there really are NO redeeming qualities for this muddled pile of propaganda.

islam is just another fascist totalitarian ideology used by power hungry fanatics on yet another quest for worldwide domination and includes all the usual human rights abuses & suppression of freedoms.

graphics version
http://img829.imageshack.us/img829/5792/dangero.jpg

pdf file this essay - click download 6kb the google viewer doesn't show fonts accurately, excellent flyer for printing & distributing

http://docs.google.com/fileview?id=0B_UyNP-72AVKYTM2OTUwODYtYjJmZC00NmM5LWI0ZDEtM2U3MThhYjVhOWJm

Anonymous August 14, 2012 at 5:23 AM  

I don't care who you are, the God I serve instructs us to "Love your wives as Christ loves the church and gave himself for it." If I see anyone beating their wife and trying to accost her in eye shot of me, he's going down. I don't care if I go to jail either. And any judge who would side with the husband shouldn't be sitting on the bench. If a witness takes an oath on the bible to tell the truth, uphold the court, isn't he in essence agreeing with what's inside of it?

Get New Posts Via Email

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

You Can Help Us Here

When you come across stories about concessions to Islam, please send them to:
citizenwarriorgeneral@gmail.com

I urge all of us to use this link whenever we mention concessions to Islam: http://concess.blogspot.com

Setting Precedents

As Robert Spencer put it: "...it's a small accommodation in itself, but it reinforces the precedent that American practices must give way to Muslim ones whenever they clash. Once that precedent is set, it does indeed lead to the Islamization of American society, unless at a certain point non-Muslims are willing to draw the line and say 'Thus far, but no farther. No more accommodation of Muslim demands.' That line will never be drawn, however, as long as Americans continue to fail to see the larger implications and inevitable outcome of these individual incidents."

  © Blogger template Ramadhan Al-Mubarak by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP